-بررسی پویایی های عوامل موفقیت تسهیم دانش با محوریت حوزه خواست

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع و سیستم‌های مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکترای مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع و سیستم‌های مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از اصلی­ترین ارکان فرآیند مدیریت دانش، تسهیم دانش به معنای تعاملات میان­فردی گسترده­ای است که موجب می‌شود دانش و تجربه بطور مؤثر و شایسته­، توزیع و جذب شوند. بمنظور تحلیل نقاط قوت و ضعف فرآیند تسهیم دانش در سازمان و تدوین سیاست­هایی جهت بهبود آن، ابتدا باید عوامل تأثیرگذار بر موفقیت فرآیند تسهیم شناسایی شوند. با توجه به تعریف سه حوزه خواست، توان و امکان در مدل بهره­وری منابع انسانی و اثرگذاری حوزه خواست بر دو حوزه دیگر، در این مقاله با مروری بر مطالعات تحقیقاتی پیشین، عوامل موردنظر بر حوزه خواست شناسایی و تحلیل شده­ است. سپس پویایی­ها و روابط فی­مابین عوامل از طریق نمودارهای علّی-معلولی بررسی شده و مورد کنکاش قرار گرفته تا با مدلسازی پویایی­های سیستم، نحوه اثرگذاری و اثرپذیری عوامل از یکدیگر مشخص شده و مدل مفهومی در این حوزه تشکیل شود. در پایان، ضمن ارائه استراتژی‌هایی در این خصوص، مدل پیشنهادی در یک شرکت مادر تخصصی صنایع غذایی پروتئینی ایرانی بررسی شده و اعتبار آن با توجه به نظر خبرگان تأیید شده است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying the Dynamics of Knowledge-Sharing Success Factors Based on Willing Criteria

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeedeh Shokouhi 1
  • Soha Safaei 1
  • Zahra Shams Esfandabadi 2
1 MSc. in Industrial Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student in Industrial Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the main bases of the knowledge management process is knowledge-sharing which means extended interpersonal interactions leading to distribution and absorption of knowledge and experience effectively and appropriately. In order to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the knowledge-sharing process in an organization and designing policies to improve it, the factors affecting the success of this process should be determined. Considering the three sections "Will", "Can" and "May" in the Human Resources Productivity model and the dominance of the "Will" amongst them, in this research, effective factors on the knowledge-sharing process based on willing criteria is determined and analysed by studying the relevant literature. Then, dynamics and relationships among these factors are discussed and a conceptual model is provided. Important strategies are also suggested in this regard. As a case study, the proposed model is applied in an Iranian mother-specialized protein food company and its validity is confirmed by the experts.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Human Resources Productivity Model
  • Knowledge sharing
  • Strategy
  • System Dynamics
  • will
Afrazeh, A., Bartsch, H., Hinterhuber, H. (2004). Human Resources Productivity meeasurment and problem solving algorithm. Amirkabir Jornal of Science and Technology. (In Persian)
Afrazeh, A. (2010). Knowledge Management (Introduction, Models, Measurement and implementation). Tehran, Dana Research Inistitute of Knowledge Management. (In Persian)
Anand, A., Walsh, I. (2015). Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing Facilities and Barriers in Indian SMEs: A Comparative Case Study. European Conference on Knowledge Management : 887-895.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4): 571−582.
Aris, A.Z.Z., (2015). Examining Relationships between Individual, Organizational Factor and Knowledge sharing behavior. Proceedings of Kuala Lumpur International Business and Social Science Research Conference. Kuala Lumpur University, Malaysia.
Babcock, P. (2004). Shedding light on knowledge management. HR Magazine, 49(5): 46−50.
Bakker, M., Leenders, R. T. A. J., Gabbay, S. M., Kratzer, J., & Van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006). Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization, 13(6): 594−605.
Boer, N.I., Berends, H. & Baalen, P. (2011). Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior, European Management Journal, 29: 85– 97.
Chen, C.J, Hung, S.W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities, Information & Management, 47(4): 226-236
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 720−735.
Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2): 245−264.
Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What'smine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4): 400−421.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronicweak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2): 119−135.
Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 928−937.
Ford, D. P., & Chan, Y. E. (2003). Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting: A case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1): 11−27.
Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. International Management, 8(1): 49−67.
Hinds, P. J., Patterson, M., & Pfeffer, J. (2001). Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1232−1243.
Hung, S.Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H.M. & Lin, W.M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69 (6): 415-427.
Jackson, S.E., Chuang, C.H., Harden, E.E., Jiang, Y., & Joseph, J. M. (2006). Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. Research in personnel and human resources management, 25: 27−70.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3): 129−154.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., & Wei, K. -K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113−143.
Kulkarni, U. R., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2006). A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3): 309−347.
Lam, A. (1996). Engineers, management and work organization: A comparative analysis of engineers' work roles in British and Japanese electronics firms. The Journal of Management Studies, 33(2): 183−212.
Lee, J. -H.; Kim, Y. -G.; Kim, M. -Y. (2006). Effects of managerial drivers and climate maturity on knowledge-management performance: Empirical validation. Information Resources Management Journal, 19(3), 48−60.
Lin, C.P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator. Personnel Review, 36(3): 457−475.
Lin, T.C., Wu, S. & Lu, C.T. (2012). Exploring the affect factors of knowledge sharing behavior: The relations model theory perspective, Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 751–764.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 535−546.
Minbaeva, D. (2007). Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 47(4): 567−593.
Mirzaei Daryani, Sh., Aslizadeh, A., Solukdar, A.R., Shahgholian, K. & Zendeh-Bafandeh, A.R. (2008). System Dynamics. Tehran, Termeh. (in persian)
Nemati, L. & Jamshidi, M.A. (2008). Studying the relationship and effect of knowledge sharing process and experience on social capital development. The first national conference on Knowledge Management. Tehran. (In Persian)
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York, Oxford University Press.
Pillet, J.C. & Carillo, K.D.A. (2016). Email-free collaboration: An exploratory study on the formation of new work habits among knowledge workers. International Journal of Information Management, 36: 113–125.
Raisinghani, M.S., Laura L.M. (2005). Strategic decisions in supply-chain intelligence using knowledge management an analytic-network-process framework, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10 (2): 114 – 121.
Sawng, Y. W., Kim, S. H., & Han, H. -S. (2006). R&D group characteristics and knowledge management activities: A comparison between ventures and large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 35(1–4): 241−261.
Schepers,P., Van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work-environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407−428.
Sondergaard, S., Kerr, M., & Clegg, C. (2007). Sharing knowledge: Contextualising socio-technical thinking and practice. The Learning Organization, 14(5): 423−435.
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of management journal, 49(6): 1239-1251.
Tagliaventi, M. R., & Mattarelli, E. (2006). The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups. Human Relations, 59(3): 291−319.
Voelpel, S. C., Dous, M., & Davenport, T. H. (2005). Five steps to creating a global knowledge-sharing system: Siemens' ShareNet. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2): 9−23.
Wang, S., Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research, Human Resource Management Review, 20 (2): 115-131.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1): 35−57.
Weiling Ke, Kwok Kee Wei. (2007). Factors affecting trading partners’ knowledge sharing: Using the lens of transaction cost economics and socio-political theories. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(7): 297–308.
Willem, A. & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations, 59(10): 1343−1370.
Yang, J. (2008). Individual attitudes and organisational knowledge sharing, Tourism Management, 29: 345–353.
CAPTCHA Image